Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Postpartum Depression Underidentified, Undertreated


One in 7 Women Positive for Recurrent Episodes of Major Depression

Deborah Brauser
Mar 21, 2013
Postpartum depression is increasingly common, new research suggests.
In a study of 10,000 women who had recently given birth, 14% — or roughly 1 in 7 — screened positive for recurrent episodes of major depression. And of these, more than 19% reported having considered harming themselves.
"The rate of postpartum depression was not surprising and [was] consistent with other estimates that have been developed from smaller samples of patients," lead author Katherine L. Wisner, MD, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and of obstetrics and gynecology, and director of the Asher Center for the Study and Treatment of Depressive Disorders at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, told Medscape Medical News.
The largest-scale depression screening of postpartum women, the study marks the first time a full psychiatric assessment was done in this patient population.
"Although this is a bit of a controversial subject, we were able to show that women will accept these types of screenings. But where we need a lot more work is how to get those who screen positive to treatment," added Dr. Wisner.
The study was published online March 13 in JAMA Psychiatry.
Dr. Katherine Wisner
A second study also conducted by Dr. Wisner and colleagues and published online March 20 in the American Journal of Psychiatry showed that infant growth during the first 12 months is unaffected by prenatal exposure to antidepressants or by maternal depression.
Although the 2 studies are very different, Dr. Wisner noted that they both highlight the importance of screening women both before and after giving birth and to discuss treatment options.
"I've been doing this for about 30 years, and I'm still really troubled by the number of women who are pregnant or postpartum and depressed and not identified. And I just want them to know that they don't have to feel like that. Don't suffer, get some help!"
Huge Public Health Problem
In the study on postpartum depression, the investigators aimed to screen for the disorder, determine the timing of episode onset, and evaluate the possibility of thoughts of self-harm.
"In the US, the vast majority of postpartum women with depression are not identified or treated even though they are at higher risk for psychiatric disorders," said Dr. Wisner in a release.
"It's a huge public health problem. A woman's mental health has a profound effect on fetal development as well as her child's physical and emotional development."
The researchers evaluated 10,000 women older than 18 years who underwent screenings 4 to 6 weeks after delivery at Magee-Womens Hospital in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Results showed that 1396 of the women screened positive for depression, as shown by a score of 10 or higher on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), and 19.3% of these women reported having thoughts of self-harm.
Seven percent of the positive-screening women had a score of 13 or higher on the EPDS, and of these, 30% reported self-harm ideation.
Of the 1396 women, 826 (59.2%) received full psychiatric assessments during at-home visits, and 147 (10.5%) underwent a diagnostic interview by telephone.
"Most of these women would not have been screened and therefore would not have been identified as seriously at risk," said Dr. Wisner.
High Rate of Bipolar Disorder
In addition, 26.5% of the women who screened positive and had an in-home assessment reported having depression prior to their pregnancy, 33.4% had first-episode onset during pregnancy, and 40.1% had first onset postpartum. More than two thirds reported a comorbid anxiety disorder.
"Clinicians need to know that the most common clinical presentation in the postbirth period is more complex than a single episode of depression," said Dr. Wisner. "The depression is recurrent and superimposed on an anxiety disorder."
Interestingly, 68.5% of the women had unipolar depressive disorders, and 22.6% had bipolar disorder.
"That's a very high rate of bipolar disorder that has never been reported in a population screened for postpartum depression before. It is significant because antidepressant drug treatment alone can worsen the course of [this] disorder," added Dr. Wisner.
Overall, she noted that screenings are very important for this patient population. In fact, she reported that screenings for perinatal mental health disorders are now mandatory in the state of Illinois.
However, "if we identify patients, we must have treatment to offer them. If you try to refer them from an obstetrical setting to a mental health setting, because of stigma and other barriers, that's very difficult," said Dr. Wisner.
"So the newer models are treatment in the obstetrical or primary practice settings — so it's like 1-stop shopping. We need to integrate our system more. If we identify these women, then we have the responsibility to provide accessible treatment. And we aren't doing so good at that right now as a society."
Infant Growth Unaffected
For the second study, the investigators evaluated 3 groups of pregnant women between the ages of 15 and 44 years: those who did not use selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and did not have depression (n = 97), those who did not use SSRIs but did have major depression (n = 31), and those who used SSRIs and had major depression (n = 46).
All were assessed at 20, 30, and 36 weeks' gestation. In addition, pairs of mothers and infants were evaluated at 2, 12, 26, and 52 weeks postpartum.
Results showed that neither maternal major depression or SSRI exposure was significantly associated with infant weight, length, or head circumference. This nonsignificance continued even after evaluating prepregnancy body mass index.
In addition, the observed infant values were comparable with population statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
"Use of SSRIs is widespread, and women who stop taking them near the time of conception have a high relapse rate," said Dr. Wisner. "Given that depression has its own negative consequences, it's important to know the effects of both treatment and the lack of treatment."
The investigators note that larger studies are now needed.
"The effect of SSRI dose or, more directly, maternal serum drug level...is also needed to drive the process of risk-benefit decision making to a new level of sophistication," they write.
Gold Standard Research
In an accompanying editorial, Barbara L. Parry, MD, from the Department of Psychiatry at the University of California, San Diego, agrees that clinicians who manage major depression during pregnancy and lactation must weigh both the risks and benefits of prescribing antidepressants.
Although previous studies have suggested that prenatal depression is associated with increased risk for preterm birth and low birth weight and that use of antidepressants during pregnancy is linked to several adverse outcomes, Dr. Parry noted that much of that research was limited because of the exclusion of specific participants — and by not assessing longer-term outcomes.
She notes that "the distinguishing feature of the current study" is its examination of the 3 distinct groups of pregnant women.
"Other strengths of the study include its prospective design, thorough participant (mother and child) assessments of clinical history, and physical examinations by raters blind to the condition," said Dr. Parry.
"Thus, this study sets the gold standard as to how to conduct sound methodological investigations in this field so that clinicians and patients have the necessary information to make informed decisions about reproductive choices."
Both studies were supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health. The study authors have reported several relevant financial relationships, which are fully listed in the original articles. Dr. Parry has reported no such financial relationships.
JAMA Psychiatry. Published online March 13, 2013. Abstract
Am J Psychiatry. Published online March 20, 2013. AbstractEditorial

Overdiagnosis on Screening Mammography 'Unavoidable'


Pam Harrison
Mar 19, 2013
 
VIENNA, Austria — The risk for overdiagnosis on screening mammography is unavoidable, and healthcare providers need to inform patients of this risk prior to screening, investigators say.
For women screened every 2 years from the age of 50 to the age of 70, about 1% "will have a breast cancer detected and treated that otherwise would not have surfaced clinically during their lifetime," Ulrich Bick, MD, from Charité Medical University in Berlin, Germany, told Medscape Medical News.
"This is highly significant and it's something we have to talk about," Dr. Bick said here at European Congress of Radiology 2013.
When he and his colleagues tracked the 30-year trend in breast cancer incidence, they found a 20% to 25% increase in the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
If the excess risk was solely related to the overdiagnosis of DCIS, the issue could be easily resolved. "Unfortunately, it is not that simple," Dr. Bick said.
Over the same 30-year interval, the investigators found an increase in the incidence of invasive breast cancer. Some, but not all, of this was likely influenced by the widespread use of hormone replacement therapy during that timeframe, Dr. Bick explained.
 
This is highly significant and it's something we have to talk about.
 
In fact, when a team of Norwegian investigators calculated the combined incidence of overdiagnosis of DCIS and invasive breast cancer in women who participated in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme, they found an estimated incidence of 17% to 20%.
In the same dataset, the overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer alone was 11% to 13%, "suggesting that about two thirds of overdiagnosis actually represents invasive cancer that's detected during screening," Dr. Bick said.
Low- and even intermediate-grade DCIS lesions can have an excellent prognosis, even in the absence of treatment, but some DCIS lesions are actually high-grade in situ cancers.
"These cancers are highly relevant for mortality and they need to be diagnosed in a timely way," Dr. Bick said.
As for low-grade DCIS, data on the natural history of these breast cancers are sparse.
The numbers suggest that roughly 50% of DCIS patients will eventually develop an invasive breast cancer, but that can take several decades.
"The main problem is whether or not you consider low-grade DCIS a cancer," Dr. Bick said. Guidelines currently dictate that once detected, DCIS should be treated and, if it is treated, it needs to be excised completely.
"These lesions are often large," Dr. Bick explained, "and a large proportion of women with low-grade DCIS undergo mastectomy." In contrast, the excision of invasive breast cancer often requires that only a small amount of tissue be removed, so surgery is often minimal, he noted.
Clinical trials have not yet identified the subset of patients who can be spared radiotherapy because of the low malignant potential of their in situ carcinoma. In the absence of these data, patients could receive radiotherapy they don't need.
In fact, no clinical trial of low-grade DCIS has found an effect of any kind of adjuvant therapy on metastatic disease or long-term survival.
Radiologists can take steps to lower the likelihood of unavoidable overdiagnosis on screening mammography.
"We all know that digital mammography increases both in situ detection of lesions, independent of grade, and invasive cancer, so it's important to use digital mammography in screening to better diagnose relevant disease," Dr. Bick said.
Screening Asymptomatic Patients
Adequate pursuit of microcalcifications on breast imaging is "highly relevant" for the detection of small invasive cancers because many of the high-grade cancers have microinvasions that are important to detect, he explained.
"I believe biopsy of a microcalcification is necessary to define the nature of the underlying abnormality," Dr. Bick said. When choosing not to treat a low-grade DCIS and proceeding with a wait and see approach, "I feel much better if I have a magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] result first. Sometimes microcalcifications are only the tip of the iceberg, and you need an MRI to exclude relevant high-grade or invasive disease in other locations, distant from the area of biopsy."
These patients should be followed-up within 6 months, he noted.
"If we diagnose low-grade DCIS, it's crucial for us as radiologists to tell patients that if they do have cancer at all, it's not the invasive breast cancer they read about, that this is not a dangerous disease. And we need to encourage physicians to reduce overtreatment," Dr. Bick said.
Session cochair Harry de Koning, MD, PhD, from Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, agrees there will always be overdiagnosis when asymptomatic patients are screened.
"However, the amount of overdiagnosis is limited to perhaps 10% to 20% of all cancers detected on mammography screening. Given the benefits of mammography, it's a reasonable balance," Dr. de Koning told Medscape Medical News.
He explained that it is reasonable to question whether certain subtypes of breast cancer, most notably low-grade DCIS, can be treated less aggressively, or perhaps not at all.
In the United Kingdom, plans are currently underway for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether the prognosis of low-grade DCIS is equivalent in those who receive treatment and those who do not.
Dr. Bick reports receiving equipment support from Hologic and Toshiba, holding a patent with Hologic, and speaking on behalf of the General Electric Company and Carestream Health. Dr. de Koning has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
European Congress of Radiology (ECR) 2013: Abstracts A63. Presented March 8, 2013.

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Low-calorie Sweeteners and the Risk of Preterm Delivery



Results From Two Studies and a Meta-analysis

Carlo La Vecchi
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2013;39(1):12-13. 
 

Background

The possible relation between low-calorie sweeteners (as well as sugar-sweetened beverages) and unfavourable pregnancy outcomes, in particular preterm delivery and low birth weight, has recently become of considerable interest, given the widespread use of low-calorie sweeteners, and the high frequency of preterm deliveries in high-income countries.

Meta-analysis

We pooled the main findings of the two studies described above using standard meta-analytic techniques.[8] The Danish data were introduced in two separate strata of carbonated and non-carbonated beverages, since any possible association was apparently stronger for carbonated beverages, both sugar-sweetened and low-calorie ones.
The results of the meta-analysis are given in Table 1. The pooled RRs in all levels of consumption were close to unity both for sugar-sweetened and for low-calorie beverages and, most important, there was no difference in the risk estimates of sugar and low-calorie beverages, since all the CIs largely overlap.
There is therefore no evidence that low-calorie beverages, which are US Food and Drug Administration approved for consumption during pregnancy, have an impact on preterm delivery at any variance from that of sugar-sweetened beverages.